<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.2" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: In the closet?</title>
	<link>http://www.4condi.com/wordpress/2007/12/06/in-the-closet/</link>
	<description>Blog about Dr. Condoleezza Rice and the future</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2008 01:15:50 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Princess Sparkle Pony</title>
		<link>http://www.4condi.com/wordpress/2007/12/06/in-the-closet/#comment-12949</link>
		<dc:creator>Princess Sparkle Pony</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Dec 2007 16:51:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.4condi.com/wordpress/2007/12/06/in-the-closet/#comment-12949</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Is someone’s private sex life a legitimate campaign or political issue? Most us would answer “no,” &lt;/i&gt;

Oh really! I think a lot of people would disagree with you on that one. So if a candidate were gay, they'd be electable and, for instance, the religious right wouldn't have anything to say about their gayness?

I guess, to paraphrase, "most of us" depends on your definition of "us."


***Blog Editor: The "us" referred to in this post was a generic "us" in referring to those of us that generally support and admire Condi.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Is someone’s private sex life a legitimate campaign or political issue? Most us would answer “no,” </i></p>
<p>Oh really! I think a lot of people would disagree with you on that one. So if a candidate were gay, they&#8217;d be electable and, for instance, the religious right wouldn&#8217;t have anything to say about their gayness?</p>
<p>I guess, to paraphrase, &#8220;most of us&#8221; depends on your definition of &#8220;us.&#8221;</p>
<p>***Blog Editor: The &#8220;us&#8221; referred to in this post was a generic &#8220;us&#8221; in referring to those of us that generally support and admire Condi.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: section9</title>
		<link>http://www.4condi.com/wordpress/2007/12/06/in-the-closet/#comment-12195</link>
		<dc:creator>section9</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Dec 2007 22:18:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.4condi.com/wordpress/2007/12/06/in-the-closet/#comment-12195</guid>
		<description>Not only that, but farther down the article in the interview with Bean, Randy "self-outed" herself as a &lt;em&gt;straight&lt;/em&gt; woman. She took umbrage at the fact that were she gay she would have remained &lt;em&gt;closeted&lt;/em&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not only that, but farther down the article in the interview with Bean, Randy &#8220;self-outed&#8221; herself as a <em>straight</em> woman. She took umbrage at the fact that were she gay she would have remained <em>closeted</em>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Olivia Zantoro</title>
		<link>http://www.4condi.com/wordpress/2007/12/06/in-the-closet/#comment-11934</link>
		<dc:creator>Olivia Zantoro</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Dec 2007 20:03:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.4condi.com/wordpress/2007/12/06/in-the-closet/#comment-11934</guid>
		<description>Here's another &lt;a href="http://news.aol.com/newsbloggers/2007/12/04/is-condi-gay-and-who-cares/" rel="nofollow"&gt;article&lt;/a&gt; by &lt;em&gt;Ben Greenman&lt;/em&gt; on AOL's News Bloggers: &lt;em&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Is Condi Gay -- and Who Cares?&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/em&gt;.  However, I disagree with some of its assumptions:

&lt;blockquote&gt;If she is gay and is part of an administration whose policies have been hostile to gay Americans, does that make her a hypocrite?&lt;/blockquote&gt;

&lt;strong&gt;&lt;em&gt;Is&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/strong&gt; the Bush administration "hostile" to homosexuals?  Conventional wisdom may assume so as a "natural" extension of opposition to gay marriage.  Coupled with nonstop repitition by the mainstream media, at every opportunity, of the Leftist party line "Republican equals homophobe" turns this falsehood into a widely accepted "truism."</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#8217;s another <a href="http://news.aol.com/newsbloggers/2007/12/04/is-condi-gay-and-who-cares/" rel="nofollow">article</a> by <em>Ben Greenman</em> on AOL&#8217;s News Bloggers: <em><strong>Is Condi Gay &#8212; and Who Cares?</strong></em>.  However, I disagree with some of its assumptions:</p>
<blockquote><p>If she is gay and is part of an administration whose policies have been hostile to gay Americans, does that make her a hypocrite?</p></blockquote>
<p><strong><em>Is</em></strong> the Bush administration &#8220;hostile&#8221; to homosexuals?  Conventional wisdom may assume so as a &#8220;natural&#8221; extension of opposition to gay marriage.  Coupled with nonstop repitition by the mainstream media, at every opportunity, of the Leftist party line &#8220;Republican equals homophobe&#8221; turns this falsehood into a widely accepted &#8220;truism.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: flwrs</title>
		<link>http://www.4condi.com/wordpress/2007/12/06/in-the-closet/#comment-11925</link>
		<dc:creator>flwrs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Dec 2007 16:02:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.4condi.com/wordpress/2007/12/06/in-the-closet/#comment-11925</guid>
		<description>Glen Kessler works for Washington Post, not AP


***B.E. True, our bad.  Correction made.  Thanks for pointing it out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Glen Kessler works for Washington Post, not AP</p>
<p>***B.E. True, our bad.  Correction made.  Thanks for pointing it out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
