Archive for the ‘polls’ Category

Fred Thompson’s Magic Carpet — Lymphoma, 2008 and the VP choice

Saturday, October 6th, 2007

Until Fred Thompson became a candidate with his declaration on the Leno Show, conservatives - for the most part - didn’t have a “first-tier” candidate in the Republican primary that really got them excited about the upcoming 2008 Presidential race in spite of the general recognition that a 2008 Democratic victory would be a tragedy for nation.  (Fred ‘08 website)

Unfortunately, it takes an actual candidate to win an election.  In the US we are only allowed to vote “for” a candidate and not “against,”  “anybody but Hillary,” or “none of the above.”

Rudy and Mitt, for many on the Right, are “compromise candidates.”  It isn’t that Rudy and Mitt are disliked on the Right.  On the contrary, they enjoy wide respect for being “Yankee Republicans” that have managed to get elected in the nearly “solid blue” Northeast.  That said, they are not viewed (by many in the GOP) as “brethren” in a struggle that predates the “Reagan Revolution.”  Furthermore, their recent conciliatory moves to the Right are viewed more as expedient political maneuvers, rather true “conversions” to the conservative point of view.

The lack of a candidate that “connected” with the so-called “Republican base” allowed Fred to remain the “stealth” candidate for months.  He has had the luxury of seeming very “presidential” by avoiding the primary race’s “squabbles.”  In the absence of definitively stated policy positions - made necessary during the “typical” primary process - the former senator continues to make the most of his Law and Order television persona, Arthur Branch, a southern conservative turned Big Apple prosecutor.  (Shouldn’t that story line have premiered on the SciFi Channel first?)  As such, he has been portrayed week, after week, season, after season, as the wise, all-knowing, “down home” and folksy older (but not elderly) boss that explains to his urban, mostly liberal staff, the conservative positions of the day using rural southern anecdotes that are conveniently, debated, and poignantly resolved in the 60-minute prime time episodes of Law and Order.  We doubt that NBC ever imagined that they were creating a conservative icon when the created Thompson’s character.

But there is a cloud on Thompson’s horizon - politically and personally.  Could a page from the Democratic history book, Paul Tsongas’ presidential campaign of 1992, be repeated?  (NY Sun, “Thompson’s Cancer Stirs Memories of Tsongas” and National Review, “The Tsongas Problem”)  Paul was Bill Clinton’s Democratic Party primary rival who made the contest a real “horse race,” until he suddenly dropped out.   Like Tsongas, Thompson returned to politics to run for President after a stint in the Senate.  Also like Tsongas, when he entered the race, relatively positive prognoses were stated by the candidate, his staff, and a variety of “experts.”   What’s not known is whether the parallels between Thompson and Tsongas include the deceptions (or the gentler description “lack of clarity” used by Tsongas) made by the 1992 Tsongas campaign regarding his recurrence of cancer and his prognosis.  (Red State, Fred Thompson’s Statement, “What you need to know — Facts about my cancer”

Nobody on his deathbed ever said, “I wish I had spent more time at the office.”   Paul Tsongas   Could Fred have shared this sentiment with Paul and then have left the Senate for an acting career?

Interestingly, Paul Tsongas died January 18, 1997, in what would have been the final days of his administration had he won the 1992 election.  (If this would have happened in the Clinton administration, think of how many pardons he never could have sold, er… granted.)  Does anybody doubt that Tsongas’ ability to govern effectively would have been affected during the final months of his administration as he was dying?  Could the same thing happen to Thompson?  Granted, the statistics on survival of patients diagnosed with Thompson’s relatively rare form of lymphoma are encouraging, but what about patients’ subjected high levels of stress - you know, like serving as President of the United States?  That’s where the theory of Fred’s “Magic Carpet” comes in to play.  (Jeremy D. Mayer at Politico.com, “Is Death on the Ballot in 2008?”)

The closer Fred Thompson gets to the nomination, the greater attention will be paid to his VP choice — especially in light of the Wall Street Journal/NBC poll just released (Rudy 30%, Fred 23%, McCain 15%, Romney 10%, Huckabee 4%).  This is the so called “magic carpet track” into the Oval Office, the Vice-Presidency on a ticket with a partner that has a fair chance of not completing their term in office.  At anytime, a future President Thompson (or Giuliani, a cancer survivor himself) could declare that he is unable to carry out his duties and elevate the VP to the Presidency.  Is this a likely scenario?  We think so.

Another issue for the Thompson campaign is his “gender gap.”  In the WSJ/NBC poll, he only had a little more than half the support among Republican women, 16%, than he showed among Republican men, 29%.  This gap is made even more urgent by Rudy’s strong support among female Republicans in the same poll (25% male, 35% female).  If Fred is the eventual nominee and doesn’t take decisive action, we suspect that this gender gap would grow larger during the general election.  Although a female VP choice is a possibility for either candidate, this makes us think that Thompson would be more likely to choose a female VP than Rudy.  For Fred, it is absolutely essential that he improve his support among women for the primary and the general election.  Is Condi on Fred’s “short list?”   Or someone else’s?  Makes one wonder, doesn’t it?  (Interesting Trivia: Both Condi and Fred are native Alabamans.)

Condoleezza Rice is third in latest Zogby poll!

Monday, March 12th, 2007

     In the latest Zogby poll,  Condoleezza Rice finished foutrth behind the McCain Romney, and Giuliani.   This is great considering she hasn’t declared.  The big news, though,  is in the same poll,  she finishes third among self-identified “conservative Republicans”, behind  Romney and Gingrich.

     Why is the conservative Republican poll important?   The conservatives are still looking for a candidate they can rally behind.  A liberal GOP candidate will not energize the conservative vote, even if he runs against Hillary Clinton. Condoleezza Rice would be an excellent choice for conservatives.  She has both pro-life and pro-Second Amendment views.  She is also the only one who can continue leading the “War on terror”,  no training required.

   I think she can also serve to unite the RINOs and conservatives of the GOP.     The RINOs will enjoy making history and heading off Hillary or Obama.  Condi doesn’t have the “lightning rod” factor like other conservative candidates.   it would be more difficult for Dems to paint a caricature of Condi as a racist-sexist-homophobe conservative. The conservatives will enjoy having an experienced , principled Republican to continue protecting our country.

   Condi is a win-win for all of the GOP.

McCain fades for 2008

Wednesday, October 11th, 2006
Marist College Institute for Public Opinion - WNBC
Sept. 2006 Feb. 2006

Rudy
Condi
McCain
Gingrich
Romney
Frist
Allen
Pataki
Brownback
Tancredo
Hagel
Other
Undecided

23%20%
15%
7%
4%
4%
2%
2%
1%
1%

na
21%

22%
22%
22%
5%
4%
2%
2%
2%

1%
1%an 17%

The results of a recent Marist poll seem to reflect the rejection of John McCain’s maverick image as he has broken with the administration over detainee treatment and other issues, in spite of the compromises that eventually settled the disputes. The top three Republican candidates are still Rudy (22%), Condi (20%) and McCain (15%), but the trends and relative numbers reveal more than just “who won.” (Angus-Reid)

First, Rudy and McCain, although they haven’t officially announced, are clearly “on the circuit” in early primary states. Condi is the only one of the trio discouraging rumors of her candidacy, yet her support remains solid as she has taken center stage in the political battles that are leading up to the 2008 election. Naysayers about her ability to withstand the rigors of a campaign are starting to take note as she has gone mano a mano with both Clintons in the past several weeks. Of course, if Hillary is the Democratic candidate, this is exactly what she’ll be faced with up until Election Day.

Second, the drop in McCain’s numbers is starting to confirm what we’ve been seeing and hearing for the past two years but not reflected in the polls — that McCain’s “loose canon” and “maverick” image are not appreciated in the Republican Party regardless of his strong general election numbers and fund raising abilities. Even so, many of us at still confused by the incongruity of poll results that keep McCain in the top 3 and widespread negative reactions to McCain at Republican gatherings.

Third, even with Rudy’s strong showing this early in the election cycle, his liberal positions make his nomination doubtful. If he did run, a destructive challenge from the right would surely occur. That, followed with the Clinton Attack machine, could take a lot of the electoral luster off of “America’s mayor.”

Lastly, although we’re biased, we think that this poll bodes very well for Condi 2008.

Condoleezza Rice on "60 Minutes"

Sunday, September 24th, 2006

Condi was interviewed by Katie Couric on “60 Minutes” tonight. You should go here if you missed it. There are lots of video clips, including ones that didn’t air.

There is also a comments section on the page. Many comments show support for her running for President in 2008. We should all add our own comments to that page!

Katie did ask Condi about running for President. This segment didn’t air on TV, of course. She said that elected office “probably” isn’t for her. (link) Despite this statement, “60 minutes” set up an online poll asking “Should Condoleezza Rice run for President?” The results are currently 50/50. Let’s get on there and vote!

Katie asked her about her views on abortion. This clip didn’t air, either. (link) She said she supports parental notification and opposes late term abortion, but she would not ban abortion.

My favorite part of the interview was when Condi drew parallels between the bombings and terrorism committed on African-Americans during the segregation days and the bombings and terrorism in the Middle East. (link) These are both instances where people were fighting for freedom and being terrorized because of it. She said that when people say “Iraq isn’t ready for democracy.” it reminds her of when people used to say “Black people are simple people. They aren’t ready for the vote.” In another unaired clip, Katie asks her about cooking fried chicken. (link) I found this a little racist and rude.

Katie also accuses her of growing up shielded from the horrors of the civil rights movement. Condi responds “Until bombs started going off in the neighborhood.” (link) (What a great response!) This clip was also unaired. In the end, Condi turned out great and very Presidential. This is a great start to stirring the presidential pot.

The Hillary Conundrum

Wednesday, September 20th, 2006

She is, to almost all Republicans, the “800-pound gorilla,” in the 2008 election. (This is not a reference to her any of her physical characteristics.) However, Americans for Dr. Rice has been very careful not to follow Dick Morris’ lead and make the next presidential contest a strictly “Condi vs. Hillary” affair. The possibility of two women in the race is a great “hook” — for book sales and bookings on the talk show circuit. But it is easier to get “blind-sided” when you have political tunnel vision. At the end of last month, there was a lot of media hoopla about the Time magazine cover with Hillary in a “presidential” profile and the “Love her-Hate her” check boxes. (Time magazine article, poll, video)

However, in spite of Hillary’s political money machine, (Hill PAC),at the end of the election cycle the only result that is important is whether you have won the general election, or not. In August, the junior senator from New York was featured on the cover of Time magazine. The results of these polls are most revealing. Conventional wisdom has it that Hillary could easily get the Democratic party’s nomination. She only needs to ask. But if the Democratic party’s ultimate goal is to win the general election, her nomination might not be their best strategy. Should we focus on Hillary, or let the Democratic primary process filter out popular, but ultimately, losing candidates. Whenever Hillary hits the news, it is undeniable that our website sees a “counter-Hillary” effect, traffic goes up, etc. There’s even a Stop Hill PAC organization. (link, We have no association with this organization.) Our independence allows us to do, and say, things that would be inappropriate from a campaign. Is this something that we can (should?) exploit?

Condoleezza Rice is Second in Iowa straw poll!

Friday, September 15th, 2006

Last month at the Iowa State Fair, there was a Presidential straw poll. In true Iowa fashion, the “Cast Your Kernel” poll had a corn theme. Channel 13 WHO-TV sponsored the poll . they wrote the names of 10 potential Democrats and 10 potential Republican presidential candidates on hard kernels of corn. People could take a kernel of their choice and place it in a jar.

Condoleezza Rice tied for second with Giuliani on the Republican side, each receiving 20% . McCain came in first with 24%.

On the Democratic side, John Edwards and Hillary Clinton tied for first with 33% each of the Democratic kernels.

Read the whole story here

Iowan Condistas: we need your help to spread the good word! Sign up on our website. If you’d like to help plan an event in your hometown, e-mail me at: Illinois@4condi.com. We have everything you need: info, talking points, balloons, stickers, and buttons.

Wes Fowler

2008: Who’s Needed in an Era of Terrorism?

Thursday, August 10th, 2006

In Opinion Editorials (”All the opinions that are fit to print” — a project of the Frontiers of Freedom center-right think tank), Lee Ellis, a retired journalist who previously worked for CBS and Gannett, filed his August 8, 2006, article, Candidates for President in 2008–Who’s Needed in an Era of Terrorism? (He must’ve worked in the days before Dan Rather lowered CBS’ journalistic standards below those of the National Enquirer.) His thesis is that Condi and Newt are the two top contenders for 2008 and that the choice between the two of them is dependent on who the Democratic nominee will be. Namely, if Hillary is nominated by the Democrats, then Condi must be the Republican nominee — echoing Dick Morris. If anyone else is nominated, then the Republicans should pick Newt. According to Mr. Ellis:

While both would make excellent presidents who would be strong leaders, it depends on whom the party of Howard Dean and Ted Kennedy nominate for President. If it chooses Hillary Clinton, then only a smart woman can defeat her. A man will lose! Only Dr Rice can outdo her on TV and, let’s face it, the 2008 presidency is going to depend on TV debates and interviews…The media has also proved by its coverage of Hillary’s 2004 Senate race and TV debates with Rick Lazio, that it will let no man beat her. Many feel strongly that the US needs its first woman President. If Hillary is nominated as the Democrat candidate, expect another Clinton presidency and all it will entail for eight solid years -UNLESS - Dr. Condoleezza Rice is nominated as the Republican choice. Those TV debates will be electrifying and Hillary will go down to defeat but a woman will reign!

At least we can agree on half of his hypothesis! The problem with the second half is that Newt, great guy that he is, is not electable in the November, 2008, general election.

Judging by how often Dr. Rice appears on Timmy Russert’s show, we conclude that he must enjoy being dominated by powerful women!

The focus on gender and race by the media in 2008 will be unavoidable if there is a female presidential candidate from either party. It will be a “first” for the nation, and provide political pundits around the world, and of all political stripes, a bottomless pit of material for their craft. But their focus will be misdirected — as so often has been the case in recent years. The media’s “talking heads” will discuss such issues as: “Is America ready for a female president?” or “Is America ready for a (fill in the blank) president?” However, in 2008, you will not find “a woman”, or “female candidate of color,” or even “caucasian female candidate that has forgiven lecherous husband his past affairs then lied about it” on the ballot.

(more…)

Condi Is Second in a Gallup Poll!!!!

Wednesday, July 19th, 2006

According to a Gallup poll released this morning, Condi is 2nd as the Republican Presidential nominee!!!

The poll asked Republicans who they found as a favorable Presidential nominee for 2008. Giuliani came in 1st with 73% of respondents describing him as a favorable nominee. Condi came in second with

 

This is big news for us because Gallup is one of the most respected polls in the country. This is a very important poll!

 

We need to keep the momentum going. Speaking of which, if you need any Condi gear: bumper stickers, t-shirts, hats, or “I Like Condi” buttons, feel free to e-mail me at: illinois@4condi.com

 

Wes Fowler

 

Illinois Chair

 

Americans for Dr. Rice